AIBR http://www.aibr.org Registro AIBR, SSCI text/plain; charset=utf-8 TY - JOUR JO - ARIES, Anuario de Antropología Iberoamericana TI - Knowledge in Motion. Reciprocity, Co-Presence, Collective Analysis and Shared Authority in Research (Alberto Arribas Lozano) VL - IS - 10 PB - Asociación AIBR, Antropólogos Iberoamericanos en Red T2 - ARIES, Anuario de Antropología Iberoamericana PY - 10 M1 - SN - 2530-7843 UR - https://aries.aibr.org/articulo/2021/17/3579/knowledge-in-motion-reciprocity-co-presence-collective-analysis-and-shared-authority-in-research-alberto-arribas-lozano DO - doi:10.11156/aibr.150207e AU - Bashaw, Robert A2 - A3 - A4 - A5 - A6 - A7 - SP - LA - Esp DA - 17/03/2021 KW - Collaborative research, social movements, para-ethnography, epistemic communities, co-analysis. AB - Spanish:

This article reflects on the praxis of collaborative research with social movements, taken here as reflexive/epistemic communities that develop their own para-ethnographic knowledge-practices. What does it entail to do research with subjects that conceive and conduct research as a key dimension of their political praxis? How does this affect the ethnographic encounter? How does it modify fieldwork? Drawing on my own research experience with social movement networks, I will discuss two challenges in collaborative research: a) the question of power, the (a)symmetry — the hierarchy — among actors; and, b) the concerns regarding the analytical autonomy of scholars. Within this framework, the article will advocate for establishing logics of co-presence and shared authority with our co-researchers.

English:

This article reflects on the praxis of collaborative research with social movements, taken here as reflexive/epistemic communities that develop their own para-ethnographic knowledge-practices. What does it entail to do research with subjects that conceive and conduct research as a key dimension of their political praxis? How does this affect the ethnographic encounter? How does it modify fieldwork? Drawing on my own research experience with social movement networks, I will discuss two challenges in collaborative research: a) the question of power, the (a)symmetry — the hierarchy — among actors; and, b) the concerns regarding the analytical autonomy of scholars. Within this framework, the article will advocate for establishing logics of co-presence and shared authority with our co-researchers.

CR - Copyright; 10 Asociación AIBR, Antropólogos Iberoamericanos en Red ER -